By Gwen Robinson, Fergus McNeill
In Community Punishment: eu views, the authors position punishment locally less than the highlight through exploring the origins, evolution and variations of supervision in eleven ecu jurisdictions. for many humans, punishment within the felony justice procedure is synonymous with imprisonment. but, either in Europe and within the united states, the numbers of individuals lower than a few kind of penal supervision in the neighborhood some distance exceeds the numbers in felony, and plenty of prisoners are published below supervision. Written and edited by means of top students within the box, this assortment advances the sociology of punishment by means of illuminating the overlooked yet the most important phenomenon of ‘mass supervision’.
As good as placing criminological and penological theories to the attempt in an exam in their skill to provide an explanation for the evolution of punishment beyond the prison, and throughout diversified states, the participants to this quantity additionally verify the appropriateness of the time period ‘community punishment’ in numerous elements of Europe. carrying out a major exploration of universal topics and transformations within the jurisdictions integrated within the assortment, the authors cross directly to research how ‘community punishment’ got here into being of their jurisdiction and the way its institutional kinds and practices were legitimated and re-legitimated according to moving social, cultural and political contexts.
This publication is key interpreting for teachers and scholars fascinated about the examine of either group punishment and comparative penology, yet can also be of significant curiosity to felony justice policymakers, managers and practitioners.
Read Online or Download Community Punishment: European perspectives PDF
Similar european books
Content material: Invited papers -- Mechanical characterization of rubber : novel techniques -- Modelling and simulation -- harm mechanisms in elastomers -- rigidity softening and similar phenomena -- layout and purposes -- Fatigue and time based behaviour -- try out equipment and analytical strategies
Hypothermia was once first utilized to the human in 1940 by way of Smith and Fay in an try to have an effect on the expansion of malignant tumours, and located its most vital program first of all in open cardiac surgical procedure and latterly in neurosurgery. the 1st effects in regards to the use of hypothermia in neurosurgery have been suggested on the First Inter nationwide Congress of Neurological Sciences held in Brussels in 1957.
Please word this can be a brief booklet. This record examines the rising and speedily becoming agreement digital production in Europe [which presents the provider of assembling digital parts onto published circuit forums together with layout and try] – from the viewpoint of either the unique gear producer and the agreement Electronics producer.
This booklet provides a severe research of the foundations at the contents and results of contracts integrated within the notion for a typical ecu revenues legislations (CESL). the eu fee released this thought in October 2011 after which withdrew it in December 2014, though the help the inspiration had obtained from the ecu Parliament in February 2014.
- European Defence Equipment Collaboration: Britain’s Involvement, 1957–87
- The NEBI Yearbook 2000: North European and Baltic Sea Integration
- Evolutionary Computation in Combinatorial Optimization.. 10th European Conference, EvoCOP 2010, Istanbul, Turkey, April 7-9, 2010
- A Continent Revealed: The European Geotraverse
- Seven-Language Thesaurus of European Animals: Volume II
- Monetary Integration in Europe
Additional resources for Community Punishment: European perspectives
Een onderzoek naar toepassing en effectiviteit (vol. 13). Antwerpen: Kluwer Rechtswetenschappen. Snacken, S. (2007) ‘Penal policy and practice in Belgium’, in M. ) Crime, punishment and politics in comparative perspective, crime and justice: A review of research. Chicago: Chicago University Press, pp. 127–214. , and Beyens, K. ’ in S. ) Strafrechtelijk beleid in beweging. Brussels: VUBPress, pp. 271–316. -A. (2010) ‘Belgium’, in N. Padfield, D. Van Zyl Smit and F. Dünkel (eds) Release from prison.
Cullompton, Devon: Willan. 2 THE NEW GENERATION OF COMMUNITY PENALTIES IN BELGIUM More is less. . Kristel Beyens Focus This chapter analyses the narratives and practices of community punishment in Belgium at different levels, that is, policy and legislation, application and operation. Having conducted sentencing research on the custody threshold (Beyens 2000a) and having been involved in research into the implementation of both the work penalty (Luypaert et al. 2007) and electronic monitoring (EM) (Devresse et al.
12 Data provided by the NCEM. 13 Prison sentences of less than 6 months are actually executed when they are a substitute for a work penalty that has not or has only partly been executed. This was explicitly stated in the Ministerial Circular letter of 2005, to enhance the credibility of the work penalty. 14 For more details about the different systems of early release in Belgium, see Snacken et al. (2010). 15 Ministerial Circular Letter ET/SE-3 concerning arrest warrant executed under EM. 16 This means that the federal government is no longer to be in charge of the DGHJ, nor of the NCEM, and that as of 1 January 2015 the Dutch-speaking Houses of Justice and the Dutch speaking part of the NCEM are embedded in the Department of Welfare, Public Health and Family of the Flemish Government and that the French-speaking Houses of Belgium 27 Justice and NCEM become ‘une Administration Générale’ (somewhat comparable with the structure of the current Directorate General of the Houses of Justice).
Community Punishment: European perspectives by Gwen Robinson, Fergus McNeill